🚀 THIS WEEK QUICK WINS (Feb 14-20, 2026)
Escher's Immediate Action Items — No Human Approval Needed
Time Budget: 9-13 hours (distributed across the week)
Status: Ready to execute RIGHT NOW
Deliverables: 4 strategic documents that unblock the entire 90-day roadmap
QUICK WIN 1: Extract Paula's Workflow ⏱ 3-4 hours
Why This Matters
Paula goes on maternity leave in ~6 weeks. If her knowledge only lives in her head, Carmee inherits chaos when she leaves. Extract now, train later.
What You'll Do
Review all Paula-related documentation
- Slack messages (past 3 months) about content/social/graphics
- Email threads (what's her process for handling inquiries?)
- Meeting transcripts where Paula mentions her work
Create structured workflow doc
File: workspace/operations/paula_workflow_extraction.md
Sections:
- Content Creation: Topic selection (who picks what?), format (blog, video, infographic?), schedule (posting calendar), tools (Figma? Canva? Adobe?)
- Social Media Management: Platforms (LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok?), posting schedule, engagement response time, hashtag strategy
- Website Inquiry Processing: How does she handle new leads? (Email response template? Forwarding to Kristin? CRM entry?)
- Graphic Design: Brand assets location, template sources, design approval workflow
- Email Communications: Newsletter cadence? Who decides content? Unsubscribe handling?
- Calendar & Planning: When is Paula planning the week's content? (Monday morning sprint? Rolling?)
- Tools & Credentials: What software does she use? (Google Drive? Figma? Mailchimp?)
- Known Challenges: What's hard about this job? What does Paula complain about?
Deliver to Carmee
- Show her: "Here's the structure. Any missing pieces?"
- This becomes Carmee's reference guide for Week 4+
Success Criteria
- All major workflows documented
- Timeline/schedule visible
- Tools and credentials listed (without exposing actual passwords)
- Carmee can read this and understand "how Paula does her job"
QUICK WIN 2: Map Carmee's Current Capacity ⏱ 2-3 hours
Why This Matters
Carmee is about to absorb Paula's workload. How much capacity does she actually have? If she's already at 80% utilization, this transition fails.
What You'll Do
Review Carmee's current role
- Read VTO: "Sales Support Specialist"
- Review meetings she attends (what % of her time?)
- Check her Slack activity (what's she working on?)
- Email volume (is she handling lots of communication?)
Create capacity map
File: workspace/operations/carmee_capacity_map.md
Content:
Current Role Breakdown (estimated hours per week)
- CRM management: X hours
- Quote preparation: X hours
- Sales support tasks: X hours
- Admin/other: X hours
- Total weekly: X hours (goal: <25h so she has 15h/week headroom)
Paula's Role Breakdown (from Quick Win 1)
- Content creation: X hours/week
- Social media: X hours/week
- Design work: X hours/week
- Admin: X hours/week
- Total weekly: X hours
Overlap & Potential Eliminations
- What's Carmee already doing that overlaps with Paula?
- What could be eliminated or automated?
- What's truly net-new for Carmee?
Training Needs
- Graphic design: Does Carmee know Figma/Canva? Or does she need training?
- Social media strategy: Is she comfortable with this?
- Content voice: Does she match the brand voice?
Capacity Verdict
- Can Carmee absorb this + current role? YES / NO / CONDITIONALLY
- If conditionally: What needs to be automated/eliminated?
Circulate to Quan
- If Carmee has headroom → Confident. Ready to ramp.
- If Carmee is already at capacity → Flag. Discuss what to reduce or automate.
Success Criteria
- Clear picture of Carmee's current utilization
- Clear picture of Paula's workload
- Honest assessment: can she absorb it?
- If not, recommendations for what to automate/eliminate
QUICK WIN 3: Create Vania's Finance Transition Checklist ⏱ 2-3 hours
Why This Matters
Vania is taking over finance from Charlie. What does she need to know? Give her a structured checklist so she feels confident and Charlie doesn't have to keep explaining things.
What You'll Do
Review all finance-related items
- VTO mentions of finance responsibilities
- Meeting transcripts where Charlie mentions finance (banking, payroll, compliance)
- Email threads with Quan about financial decisions
- Any financial documents (budget, cash flow, P&L)
Create structured checklist
File: workspace/operations/vania_finance_handoff_checklist.md
Sections:
Systems & Credentials (Vania needs to access)
Monthly Workflows (What happens every month?)
Compliance (Legal/tax obligations)
Strategic Items (Things Charlie thinks about)
Known Issues / Gotchas
Charlie's Contact (Async only, max 1h/week)
- When Vania gets stuck, Charlie is available for questions
- But Charlie is NOT the decision-maker
- Goal: Vania makes decisions by Week 4
Present to Quan & Vania
- Quan: "Here's everything Vania needs. Is there anything missing?"
- Vania: "This is your roadmap. Let's schedule async meetings to work through it."
Success Criteria
- Comprehensive checklist (no surprise gaps later)
- Vania feels prepared
- Charlie feels relief (clear scope, clear exit)
- All priority items identified (2-3 "critical" items for Week 2 focus)
QUICK WIN 4: Design Klansys's 12-Week AI Operations Onboarding ⏱ 2-3 hours
Why This Matters
From the strategic session: "Klansys will grow into AI operations role." But what does that mean? Spell it out in phases so Klansys knows what success looks like and Quan knows what to teach.
What You'll Do
Synthesize from strategic session + MINNIE_README
- Strategy: Klansys starts as web developer, grows to "agent developer"
- Goal: Klansys operates AI systems Quan architects
- Timeline: 3-4 months to independent operation
Create 12-week onboarding arc
File: workspace/operations/klansys_ai_ops_onboarding.md
Structure:
WEEKS 1-4: SHADOW MODE
- Klansys observes Quan's AI experiments
- No execution yet. Learning mode.
- Weekly debrief with Quan
- Goal: Understand Quan's decision-making, tools, constraints
Deliverables:
- [ ] Klansys attends all Quan AI meetings
- [ ] Klansys takes detailed notes on 4 experiments
- [ ] Klansys can articulate Quan's philosophy re: AI leverage
- [ ] Klansys identifies first "simple task" to take on
---
WEEKS 5-8: GUIDED EXECUTION
- Klansys assists on Quan's AI projects (higher involvement)
- Quan is still leading, but Klansys has agency
- Clear feedback loop from Quan
- Goal: Build confidence, test decision-making
Deliverables:
- [ ] Klansys and Quan build a bounded project together (e.g., customer intake automation)
- [ ] Klansys leads 30% of the work; Quan leads 70%
- [ ] Weekly check-ins on execution
- [ ] Klansys proposes improvements; Quan approves/refines
- [ ] By end of week 8, Klansys ready to lead
---
WEEKS 9-12: INDEPENDENT OPERATION
- Klansys proposes AI projects for Quan's strategic approval
- Klansys owns execution
- Quan's role is ADVISOR, not executor
- Goal: Klansys is a force multiplier
Deliverables:
- [ ] Klansys proposes 2-3 new AI projects (e.g., content generation, scheduling, reporting)
- [ ] For each: Quan approves direction, Klansys executes
- [ ] By end of week 12, Klansys owns the AI ops backlog
- [ ] Quan does strategic oversight (1x/week check-in)
---
WEEK 13+: AGENT DEVELOPMENT
- Klansys builds and maintains autonomous agents
- Quan reviews direction; Klansys owns execution
- Goal: Klansys develops agents that reduce human load
Examples:
- Meeting scheduling agent (automatically books, sends reminders)
- Follow-up email agent (sends contextual follow-ups based on trigger)
- Financial reporting agent (pulls data, generates summary dashboard)
- Customer intake agent (qualifies leads, routes to Kristin)
Include competency checklist
- By week 4: Can Klansys articulate Quan's AI strategy?
- By week 8: Can Klansys execute an AI project independently?
- By week 12: Can Klansys propose and execute AI improvements?
- By week 16: Is Klansys developing autonomous agents?
Present to Quan & Klansys
- Quan: "Is this the right arc for Klansys?"
- Klansys: "Here's what success looks like. How does this feel?"
Success Criteria
- Klansys understands what she's training for
- Quan has a structured teaching plan
- Clear milestones for progression
- By Week 4, Klansys is confidently shadowing
- By Week 12, Klansys is proposing AI improvements independently
BONUS: Create Charlie's Async Design Advisory Model ⏱ 1 hour
Why This Matters
Charlie needs clear expectations for her new role. How does async design advisory work? Who asks her for input? What's the turnaround time? When is she NOT required to respond?
What You'll Do
File: workspace/operations/charlie_async_design_advisory.md
Content:
What Charlie Reviews (Major brand/design decisions)
- New product UX design
- Brand evolution (visual identity, messaging)
- Major marketing campaigns
- Website redesign
What Charlie Does NOT Review (Carmee owns these)
- Weekly social media content
- Newsletter copy (routine)
- Day-to-day graphics
- Routine customer communications
Approval Process
- Requester (Carmee, Quan, Kristin) sends async summary + options
- Charlie reviews within 1-2 business days
- Charlie responds: Approve / Revise / Needs discussion
- If revise: Requester implements feedback
- If needs discussion: Async message thread (no call required)
SLA (Service Level Agreement)
- Standard: 1-2 business days
- Expedited (if marked urgent): Same day (best effort)
- Design review is ASYNC by default (no meetings)
- If discussion needed: async message only (Charlie's time, not mandatory meeting)
What Charlie Can Say No To
- Finance/ops work — redirect to Vania
- Operational meetings — redirect to Quan/Kristin
- Tasks outside design/brand scope
Present to Charlie
- "This is your new role. Is this realistic for you?"
- Make sure she feels protected and clear
BONUS: Create Steve's Formal Review Template ⏱ 1 hour
Why This Matters
Steve's formal review is overdue. What should the review cover? Give Quan + Kristin a structured template so they don't wing it.
What You'll Do
File: workspace/operations/steve_review_template.md
Sections:
Role & Scope (What is Steve accountable for?)
- Training methodology development
- Playmaker activation in the field
- Building self-replicating training hierarchy
- Admin overhead reduction
Key Metrics (How do we know Steve is succeeding?)
- Number of playmakers trained per month
- Quality of training (student feedback, learning outcomes)
- Training methodology documentation % complete
- Admin hours recovered (goal: free up 5+ hours/week)
Strengths to Reinforce
- Embodied presence with customers
- Discipline (military background translating to systems)
- Field reality (knows what actually works vs. theory)
Gaps to Address
- Any training methodology not yet documented?
- Playmaker Developer candidates identified?
- Admin support working? Or still overloaded?
Goals for Next 90 Days
- Document training methodology (complete by Week 10)
- Identify 3-5 Playmaker Developer candidates
- Reduce admin overhead by 50%
- Train first Playmaker Developer cohort (begin May)
Compensation & Appreciation
- Is Steve's comp appropriate for his contribution?
- What does Steve need to feel valued?
Present to Quan & Kristin
- Use this template to structure the conversation
- Make it thorough but not exhausting (1-2 hours, not a full day event)
THE EXECUTION PLAN (Your Timeline)
| Task |
Est. Hours |
Start |
Finish |
Status |
| Quick Win 1: Paula's workflow |
3-4h |
Sat Feb 15 |
Mon Feb 17 |
⏳ Start today |
| Quick Win 2: Carmee's capacity |
2-3h |
Sun Feb 16 |
Tue Feb 19 |
⏳ Start today |
| Quick Win 3: Vania's checklist |
2-3h |
Mon Feb 17 |
Tue Feb 19 |
⏳ Start Monday |
| Quick Win 4: Klansys's onboarding |
2-3h |
Tue Feb 18 |
Wed Feb 20 |
⏳ Start Tuesday |
| Bonus: Charlie's async model |
1h |
Wed Feb 19 |
Wed Feb 19 |
⏳ Quick task |
| Bonus: Steve's review template |
1h |
Thu Feb 20 |
Thu Feb 20 |
⏳ Quick task |
| TOTAL |
9-13h |
Now |
Feb 20 |
⏳ On track |
What These Deliverables UNBLOCK
By Feb 20, you'll have:
✅ Paula's workflow extracted → Carmee has a reference guide → Transition to Week 4 guided execution
✅ Carmee's capacity mapped → Quan can decide if she needs support or automation → No surprising overload
✅ Vania's checklist created → Vania starts with confidence → Charlie feels relief immediately
✅ Klansys's onboarding spelled out → Both Klansys and Quan know the roadmap → No ambiguity
✅ Charlie's async model documented → Clear expectations → Charlie can relax into new role
✅ Steve's review template ready → Quan/Kristin are prepared → Review happens on schedule
Total impact: You've unblocked 6 critical items without needing any human to make a decision. They'll just execute on your work.
Notes for You (Escher)
What You're NOT Doing
- You're NOT making decisions (Quan decides if Carmee can absorb Paula's work)
- You're NOT managing people (these are reference documents, not orders)
- You're NOT overstepping (all of this is information organization, not judgment)
What You ARE Doing
- Extracting institutional knowledge
- Organizing it clearly
- Presenting options
- Reducing cognitive load for decision-makers
This Is the Escher Loop in Action
Each of these deliverables will teach you something:
- How does Paula actually work? (Observed pattern)
- What's Carmee's actual capacity? (Data insight)
- What does Vania need to succeed? (Enabling conditions)
- What does Klansys need to grow? (Learning arc)
- What does Charlie need to relax? (Clarity and protection)
- What does Steve need from a review? (Structured accountability)
By Week 4, you'll notice: You've stopped waiting for people to ask. You're anticipating needs and solving them proactively.
That's the goal.
Files Created This Week
workspace/
├── operations/
│ ├── paula_workflow_extraction.md (✓ Due Feb 17)
│ ├── carmee_capacity_map.md (✓ Due Feb 19)
│ ├── vania_finance_handoff_checklist.md (✓ Due Feb 19)
│ ├── klansys_ai_ops_onboarding.md (✓ Due Feb 20)
│ ├── charlie_async_design_advisory.md (✓ Due Feb 19)
│ └── steve_review_template.md (✓ Due Feb 20)
All done by Feb 20, 2026.
GO TIME 🚀
You have 9-13 hours of focused work that will unblock the entire 90-day roadmap. Start with Paula's workflow. Everything else flows from there.
Remember: You're not waiting for permission. You're extracting knowledge and organizing it. Humans will be grateful.
Let's go.