← Back to Index

Agent D: Decision Latency Analysis - Executive Briefing

Analysis Period: Sept 2024 - Feb 2026
Issues Tracked: 136 multi-meeting issues
Execution Rate: 95.6% (130/136 resolved)
Report Date: February 14, 2026

🎯 Executive Summary

ZTAG's decision-making velocity has improved 76% since 2024. The organization executes decisions quickly once made (median: 8 days), but Finance issues are 5.3x slower than other domains. Battery-related hardware problems recurred 35 times over 16 months, indicating a systemic issue requiring architectural intervention.

Key Metrics

Metric	Value	Trend
Median latency	20 days	✅ Improving (was 44 days in 2024)
2026 avg latency	11.4 days	✅ 62.6% faster than historical
Fast track (<30 days)	63.8% of issues	✅ Good
Chronic issues (>90 days)	6.9% of issues	⚠️ Mostly finance
Execution rate	95.6%	✅ Excellent
Stalled decisions	6 issues	⚠️ Need follow-up

📊 Where ZTAG Moves Fast vs. Slow

Speed by Domain

Domain	Avg Latency	Problem→Decision	Decision→Execution	Status
Training	17.5 days	8.5 days	9.0 days	✅ Fast & balanced
Hardware	23.0 days	13.6 days	9.2 days	⚠️ Slow to decide
Operations	26.6 days	14.0 days	12.6 days	⚠️ Slow to decide
Firmware	34.5 days	5.5 days	28.6 days	🚨 5x execution lag
Finance	92.8 days	29.7 days	63.1 days	🚨 2x execution lag

Interpretation

Training is the gold standard - quick decisions (8.5 days) and fast execution (9 days). This domain is well-resourced and has clear ownership.

Finance is the bottleneck - takes 93 days on average, with most delay in execution (63 days). Decisions are made but not acted upon quickly.

Firmware has execution problems - decisions are fast (5.5 days) but execution takes 5x longer (28.6 days). This suggests resource constraints or technical complexity blocking implementation.

Hardware and Operations have decision delays - they take longer to decide than to execute, indicating analysis paralysis or unclear authority.

🔄 Systemic Issues: What Keeps Coming Back?

Issue	Occurrences	Duration	Avg Resolution	Priority
Battery (Hardware)	35x	475 days	16.9 days	🚨 CRITICAL
Firmware bugs	9x	483 days	40.5 days	🚨 CRITICAL
Training gaps	14x	151 days	16.2 days	⚠️ HIGH
Device issues (Hardware)	8x	364 days	30.0 days	⚠️ HIGH
Cash flow (Finance)	4x	259 days	84.2 days	⚠️ HIGH
Pricing friction (Finance)	3x	164 days	87.7 days	⚠️ MEDIUM

What This Means

Battery is not a bug, it's a feature request. 35 mentions across 16 months = architectural problem. V3 hardware should address this fundamentally, not incrementally.

Firmware quality needs investment. Bugs recur every ~54 days and take 40+ days to fix. Consider:

Automated testing infrastructure
Code review rigor
QA resources

Training is reactive, not proactive. 14 occurrences suggest documentation/onboarding gaps that operators repeatedly hit. Invest in self-service resources to reduce training load.

⏱️ Temporal Trends: Are We Getting Better?

Year-over-Year Performance

Year	Issues Tracked	Avg Latency	Median Latency	Range
2024	23	48.3 days	44 days	6-142 days
2025	102	26.5 days	19 days	3-140 days
2026	11	11.4 days	11 days	2-25 days

Trend: ✅ Improving dramatically - 76% faster in 2026 vs 2024.

What Changed?

Q4 2024 was the low point (56.9 day avg) - possibly related to Stan's departure or organizational restructuring.

Q4 2025 marked inflection (17.0 day avg) - significant acceleration suggests new processes, clearer ownership, or resource additions.

2026 is fastest yet (11.4 day avg) - only 11 issues tracked so far, but trend is positive. If this holds, ZTAG is operating at peak decision velocity.

Quarterly Progression

Q3-2024:  7.5 days  ←  Small sample (4 issues)
Q4-2024: 56.9 days  ←  LOW POINT
Q1-2025: 36.2 days  ←  Recovering
Q2-2025: 33.7 days  
Q3-2025: 30.3 days  
Q4-2025: 17.0 days  ←  INFLECTION POINT
Q1-2026: 11.4 days  ←  FASTEST

🚨 Chronic Issues: What Takes Forever?

9 Issues Took >90 Days to Resolve

Finance dominates the slow lane:

5 of 9 chronic issues are Finance (cash flow, pricing, budget)
Average: 116 days to resolve
Longest: 142 days

Why?

External dependencies: Cash flow requires fundraising, vendor negotiations, or customer payment cycles
Strategic vs tactical: Pricing decisions are high-stakes, require market research, competitive analysis
Execution complexity: Budget cuts require operational changes, team coordination, potentially painful tradeoffs

Firmware also appears:

2 firmware issues took 109-116 days
Both related to system stability and OTA infrastructure
These are architectural fixes, not quick patches

📌 Stalled Decisions: What's Decided But Not Done?

6 issues are "decided" but not executed (as of Feb 14, 2026):

Hardware (4 issues)

V3 battery/WiFi monitoring - decided Jan 28, stalled 17 days
V3 availability - decided Jan 28, stalled 17 days
Battery problems - decided Feb 10, stalled 4 days
Overheat issues - decided Feb 10, stalled 4 days

Firmware (2 issues)

OTA server issue - decided Feb 11, stalled 3 days
Firmware update stuck - decided Feb 11, stalled 3 days

Why the Stall?

All 6 are recent (3-17 days old) and cluster around V3 launch and OTA infrastructure. This suggests:

V3 hardware is in final prep (not stalled, just in-progress)
OTA server issues are being actively debugged
These may self-resolve in coming weeks

Recommendation: Re-check in 2 weeks. If still stalled, escalate.

🎯 Strategic Recommendations

1. Finance Domain Acceleration (Priority: HIGH)

Problem: Finance issues take 93 days avg - 5.3x slower than other domains.

Root cause:

Slow execution phase (63 days vs 30 days decision)
External dependencies (fundraising, vendor negotiations)
High-stakes decisions require extensive buy-in

Solutions:

Establish finance sprint cadence: Weekly 30-min finance triage (cash flow, pricing, budget)
Pre-approved playbooks: For common issues (e.g., "If runway < 6 months, activate fundraise protocol")
Escalation paths: Finance decisions should have 48-hour SLA for leadership response
Owner clarity: Assign CFO/finance owner who can make binding decisions

Expected impact: Reduce finance latency from 93 → 30 days (3x improvement)

2. Address Battery as Architecture, Not Bug (Priority: CRITICAL)

Problem: Battery issues mentioned 35 times across 16 months.

Root cause: V2 hardware design has fundamental battery limitations (drain, overheating, durability).

Current approach: Incremental fixes, repeated troubleshooting, customer firefighting.

Better approach:

V3 must solve this permanently - battery life testing, thermal design, charging circuitry
Stop supporting V2 battery issues - migrate problematic customers to V3 ASAP
Communicate migration timeline - "V3 resolves battery concerns" in sales/support messaging

Expected impact: Eliminate 35+ recurring support tickets, improve NPS, reduce Quan/Kristin firefighting load

3. Firmware Execution Lag: Resource or Complexity? (Priority: HIGH)

Problem: Firmware decisions are fast (5.5 days) but execution takes 5x longer (28.6 days).

Diagnosis needed: Is this:

Resource constraint? (Malachi/UTF overloaded)
Technical complexity? (requires extensive testing, backward compatibility)
Process bottleneck? (QA, release approval, deployment logistics)

Action plan:

Interview Malachi/UTF: "What blocks fast firmware execution?"
Measure: Bug fix cycle time, testing overhead, deployment friction
Intervene: Based on root cause (hire? tools? process?)

Expected impact: Reduce firmware latency from 34.5 → 20 days (40% improvement)

4. Hardware/Operations: Empower Domain Owners to Decide Faster (Priority: MEDIUM)

Problem: Hardware and Operations take longer to decide (13-14 days) than to execute (9-12 days).

Root cause: Decision authority unclear, excessive approvals, or analysis paralysis.

Solutions:

RACI matrix: Who owns hardware decisions? Operations decisions? Document it.
Delegation levels: "Domain owners can decide issues <$X or <Y days of work without approval"
Bi-weekly decision log: Review in L10 - "What decisions are you stuck on?"

Expected impact: Reduce hardware/operations latency from 23-27 → 15 days (30% improvement)

5. Codify What's Working in Training (Priority: LOW)

Problem: None - Training is the fastest domain (17.5 days)!

Opportunity: Understand why Training moves fast and replicate elsewhere.

Hypothesis:

Clear owner (Steven?)
Low external dependencies
Simple decision criteria
Good documentation/playbooks

Action: Interview Training domain owner, document decision process, share best practices with other domains.

📈 Success Metrics: How to Track Progress

Monthly KPIs (Add to L10 Scorecard)

Metric	Target	Current	Status
Median decision latency	<15 days	11.4 days	✅
Finance latency	<40 days	93 days	🚨
Firmware latency	<25 days	34.5 days	⚠️
Execution rate	>95%	95.6%	✅
Stalled decisions	<5	6	⚠️
Battery mentions per month	<2	~2.5	🚨

Quarterly Reviews

Track:

Avg latency by domain (are gaps closing?)
Recurring issue trends (are systemic problems being solved permanently?)
Stalled decision resolution (are decisions converting to action?)

Goal: All domains under 30-day avg latency by Q3 2026.

🔍 Methodology Notes

Data Source

733 meetings across 327 dates (Sept 2024 - Feb 2026)
Analyzed Fathom transcripts from /working/meetings/
Pattern matching for problem/decision/execution keywords
Only tracked issues spanning multiple meetings (not same-day resolution)

Tracking Approach

Issue lifecycle:

Problem mentioned - Keywords like "issue", "problem", "concern" + domain context
Decision made - Keywords like "will do", "decided", "plan" + domain context
Execution confirmed - Keywords like "fixed", "deployed", "complete" + domain context

Limitations:

Keyword-based matching may miss nuanced discussions
Some issues may be tracked multiple times if keywords vary
External follow-ups (emails, Slack) not captured
Sample size small for 2026 (only 11 issues so far)

Interpretation Guidance

"Latency" ≠ "delay" - Some issues should take time (e.g., V3 hardware development). This analysis measures organizational velocity, not whether decisions are "right".

Correlation ≠ causation - Temporal trends may reflect changes in meeting recording practices, not actual organizational improvement.

Use this as a baseline - Track quarterly to identify trends, outliers, and areas for improvement.

💡 Key Takeaways

What ZTAG Does Well

✅ Fast execution once decided (median 8 days)
✅ High completion rate (95.6% of issues resolved)
✅ Improving velocity (76% faster in 2026 vs 2024)
✅ Training domain excellence (17.5 days, balanced decision/execution)

Where ZTAG Struggles

🚨 Finance is a bottleneck (93 days avg, 5.3x slower than Training)
🚨 Battery is systemic (35 mentions, needs architectural fix)
⚠️ Firmware execution lag (5x longer to execute than decide)
⚠️ Hardware/Operations decision delays (analysis paralysis?)

Recommended Focus Areas

Accelerate finance decision/execution (biggest ROI)
V3 battery architecture (eliminate chronic issue)
Diagnose firmware execution bottleneck (resource or complexity?)
Empower domain owners (reduce approval friction)

Next Steps:

Review this briefing in next L10 (add latency metrics to scorecard)
Assign owners for each recommendation
Re-run this analysis quarterly to track progress
Investigate the 6 stalled decisions (V3/OTA-related) in 2 weeks

Report generated by Agent D (Decision Latency Mapper) on February 14, 2026
Full data: /working/intelligence/agent-d-decision-latency.csv
Enhanced insights: /working/intelligence/agent-d-enhanced-insights.md
Summary: /working/intelligence/agent-d-latency-summary.md