โ† Back to Index

๐Ÿง  ZTAG ORG COGNITION ANALYSIS

Master Research Spec v1.0


๐ŸŽฏ Objective

Use the full Fathom meeting corpus (~748 meetings, Sep 2021 โ†’ Feb 2026)
as a longitudinal dataset to identify:

  1. Hidden organizational blind spots
  2. Operator identity formation dynamics
  3. Decision-making bottlenecks
  4. Alignment (or drift) from VTO
  5. Internal engagement decay
  6. Role--Reality mismatches
  7. Cultural vs technical scaling constraints

We are not summarizing meetings.

We are extracting:

Latent cross-meeting behavioral patterns
that would not be visible through human micro-cognition
but become obvious across hundreds of meetings.


๐Ÿ“‚ Data Sources

Primary:

working/meetings/YYYY-MM-DD/*.json

Reference:

reference/ztag/ZTAG-VTO-Vision-Traction-Organizer.md

๐Ÿงฌ Analysis Framework

Spin up the following agents in parallel:


Agent A --- Identity Adoption Event (IAE) Detector

Detect linguistic transitions in operator-facing calls where ZTAG shifts
from:

Externalized Product Framing:

to:

Internalized Ownership Framing:

Output:

deployment_id
meeting_date
speaker
pre_shift_examples
post_shift_examples
shift_confidence_score (0โ€“1)

Agent B --- Shelfware Risk Detector

Across deployments with no IAE detected, scan for:

Output:

deployment_id
shelfware_risk_score
risk_pattern_examples

Agent C --- Organizational SWOT Extractor

From internal meetings only:

Infer:

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Opportunities:

Threats:

Output:

SWOT_heatmap_by_workstream
representative_excerpts

Agent D --- Decision Latency Mapper

For each issue raised:

Track:

problem_first_mentioned_date
decision_date
execution_reference_date
latency_days

Cluster by:


Agent E --- Phantom Topic Detector

Detect topics that:

Output:

topic
meeting_count
first_seen
last_seen
execution_detected (Y/N)

Agent F --- Internal Alignment Gradient Mapper

Per speaker:

Score:

Cluster into:


Agent G --- Engagement Decay Curve

For each participant:

Track over time:

Detect:


Agent H --- Role--Reality Mismatch

Compare:

Detect:


Agent I --- VTO Semantic Alignment Auditor

Load:

reference/ztag/ZTAG-VTO-Vision-Traction-Organizer.md

Extract:

Score each internal meeting:

core_values_alignment (0โ€“1)
core_focus_alignment (0โ€“1)
market_alignment (0โ€“1)
10yr_trajectory_alignment (0โ€“1)
anti_partner_guardrail_adherence (0โ€“1)

Detect:


Agent J --- Playmaker Formation Index (PFI)

Compute:

PFI =
(Identity Adoption Events ร— Post-Adoption Engagement)
รท Shelfware Risk

Rank deployments by:

PFI_score

Top quartile = locally legitimized ZTAG nodes


๐Ÿ“Š Final Deliverables

Produce:

  1. Identity Adoption Distribution
  2. Shelfware Risk Distribution
  3. SWOT Heatmap
  4. Decision Latency Clusters
  5. Phantom Topic Index
  6. Alignment Cluster Map
  7. Engagement Decay Graph
  8. Role--Reality Mismatch Table
  9. VTO Alignment Heatmap
  10. Persistent Drift Patterns
  11. Top 25 Deployments by PFI
  12. Reorg / Reset Recommendations based on:
    • alignment
    • ownership gaps
    • coordination load

Execution Notes


Primary Question to Answer:

Is ZTAG's scalable growth unit:

Systems deployed
or
Playmaker identities installed?