Date: Feb 15, 2026
Status: β
RESOLVED - Webhook operational
ONLY (385) 485-5863 maps to Quan's personal phone.
NEVER use any other Quo numbers.
/home/node/.openclaw/credentials/quo-api.jsoncurl http://localhost:18791/tools/quo-messaging.pyQuo API β (webhook URL) β Cloudflare Tunnel β VPS:18791 β OpenClaw
Minnie thought:
Actual problems:
docker-compose.override.yml needed update)gw-e3364c just needed one more ingress rulemessage.created event, Quo sends message.receiveddata, actual path is data.objecttext field, Quo uses body1. Docker Port Mapping
# docker-compose.override.yml
ports:
- "18791:18791"
Recreated container with: docker-compose up -d --force-recreate
2. Cloudflare Tunnel Config
Used existing tunnel gw-e3364c, added:
sms-7f2a1b.relay9kq.ussms-7f2a1b.relay9kq.us β http://localhost:18791systemctl restart cloudflared3. Systemd Service
Created /etc/systemd/system/quo-webhook.service (handler runs as service, survives reboots)
4. Handler Bugs
Fixed quo-webhook-handler-v2.py event parsing to match Quo's actual webhook payload format.
β
SMS to (385) 485-5863 β Quo webhook β Telegram (working)
βΈοΈ Telegram β SMS reply (manual via quo-messaging.py, not auto-wired yet)
# Check webhook handler status
ps aux | grep quo-webhook
# Test webhook handler locally
curl http://localhost:18791/
# Check Cloudflare tunnel status
cloudflared tunnel list
# View webhook logs
tail -f /var/log/quo-webhook.log
Session notes as we debug together